We welcome as members individuals and organisations who care for Hammersmith
As a Member, you will receive at least two printed newsletters and regular email updates each year, outlining our activities, and giving you the opportunity to participate in our campaigns. Members are always encouraged to take an active part in the work done by the committee – come along and see if you can help.
The membership year runs from 1st January, and only costs £6 for individuals £8 for couples or families, and £15 for organisations. Additional voluntary donations are always welcome.
Environment Award 2018
TV Centre redevelopment
Nancye Goulden Award 2003
Ravenscourt Park walled garden
Conservation Award 2017
Bush Theatre
Conservation Award 2012
St Peters Church
Conservation Award 2015
Hammersmith Station
Nancye Goulden Award 2019
Hammersmith Grove Parklets
Environment Award 2016
Dunnhumby building
Special Award 2015
The Eventim Apollo
Environment Award 2015
Dorsett Hotel
Nancye Goulden Award 2011
Phoenix School Caretaker’s House
Environment Award 2008
Maggie's centre
Conservation Award 2010
St Paul's church
Conservation Award 2011
20 St Peter’s Square
Nancye Goulden Award 2019
Paintbox Studios | Coffeeology
Tom Ryland Award for Conservation 2019
St. Augustine's Church
Nancye Goulden Award 2014
Temple Lodge
Nancye Goulden Award 2013
The Ginger Pig
Environment Award 2018
Queen's Wharf & Riverside Walk
Nancye Goulden Award 2018
St Paul's Girls School Pavilion
Nancye Goulden Award 2018
2A Loftus Road
Environment Award 2010
Burlington Danes School
Environment Award 2015
Waldo Road, College Park
Nancye Goulden Award 2017
20 St James Street
The Society seeks to preserve and enhance the architecture and urban environment in Hammersmith by promoting public interest in, and campaigning for, an improved townscape [ more]
Note: Automatically updated daily in the early evening, case figures are revised upwards for up to 7 days due to testing delays: today’s tests (always 0), yesterday’s and the day before’s appear historically unrepresentative, and are filtered out.
News Update | |
The Ravenscourt Park Tea House, a popular stopping point in the park, has been in a dilapidated condition for some time, and been a concern of the Friends of Ravenscourt Park, as well as being on Historic England’s Buildings At Risk register. It closed in 2019 largely because of its increasingly poor condition.
The Friends, chaired by our committee member, Annabelle May, had a very informative and encouraging meeting recently with senior planning officer Steve Hollingworth and head of capital projects Nilesh Pankhania. Two architects from Burrell Foley Fischer also attended, and showed their detailed plans for total external refurbishments, using the approved materials, with the aim of making the building weather proof and usable again. A stark revelation was the neglect and inappropriate patching-up of past decades.
Ravenscourt Park Tea House – from 2021/00539/LBCHF
These works also include the much-needed total redesign and refurbishment of all the public toilets on the site. The planning application has been lodged, and they hope to be able to start works in early summer. We were told that funding has been identified.
Ravenscourt Park Tea House – 1831 – from 2021/00539/LBCHF
As the Friends have campaigned for a long time about the deteriorating state of this important 200 year old Grade II historic building, this was all extremely good news, and as a focal point in the Park we all look forward to seeing it in use as a café again before too long.
Garages are an endangered species, locally and across London. Where once council flats would have had rows of garages below – often beloved of British spy and detective dramas where exclusively bad stuff happens – new developments are mandated not only to have bicycle storage, but also to be car-free, meaning garage-free too. Free-standing garages and similar of all sizes are being demolished for housing, and as we’ve experienced locally, offices too.
The car is next on the endangered species of course, and current bogeyman of every level of government and social media alike. One can only wonder when the car is completely green, producing no emissions – tailpipe or otherwise – running on tyres made of waste plastic designed to shed no particulate matter, what the Twitterati will have to berate us old dinosaurs with? Don’t laugh – it’s only a decade or so away.
Lest we disappear down that rabbit hole, let’s focus on garages, and why they might be important for a range of socio-economic reasons, not as just car storage, which few ever used them for anyway. The site pictured above is from our 2012 collection of 50 favourite places, and true to form, was developed soon after and became the location of a Nancye Goulden Award of 2015 – with not a garage in sight.
We are reminded by last week’s Last Word that Sidney Alford, the maverick explosives expert who created methods of defusing the terrorist’s preferred weapon – the Improvised Explosive Device – started in a garage. Locally, Shepherds Bush, to quote our follower @sbcalling …nowhere else on the planet has a richer history of rock & roll, TV, film and pop culture than Shepherd’s Bush, White City & Hammersmith, and where the NME has claimed one rock star to every 1,222 of the population, may have significantly benefited from garages. Many an act has started in one, often for practice, away from others, making as much noise as they like, there’s a plethora of terminology relating to garage bands, a garage rock genre and so-on. It certainly worked out for locals The Who, punk icons The Clash (Garageland) and the maverick Sex Pistols, with a drama filmed recently in The Cross Keys, 45 years on. Not much more than a glorified garage at the time, the laundry behind the award-winning 22 St Peter’s Square, AKA Island Studios, became rather significant to a huge swathe of the music industry in the 1960’s and 1970’s as Chris Blackwell’s Island Records.
Maybe no longer to your taste, but while pondering a misspent youth fixing cars in parent’s garages, including a less-fondly remembered side-line of garage rock, think of the economic benefits of garages:
Steve Jobs Garage
That totals over $6 Trillion, or about twice the entire UK GDP – we clearly need more, not fewer garages, preferably of the double variety, with power. So, before you convert your garage into another bedroom – as a quick scan of the streetscape and today’s H&F planning alert reminds us – remains a popular local sport, sometimes even sans planning, you might instead consider sprucing it up as a Covid-Recovery Incubator Space, and you could be onto a winner. As we’ve said many times in response to planning applications, the lack of amenity and similar space, particularly the derisory minimum afforded by the 1.5m x 1.5m balcony beloved of flat developers, is harmful in more ways than may be immediately obvious.
It’s now just over six months since the Bridge was closed to pedestrians and cyclists, and over 22 months since it was closed to traffic, yet there is neither a Bridge repair contract nor an alternative crossing facility in place. Repair work will not progress until there is forward funding to pay the estimated £128M cost (over and above TfL funded temporary stabilisation works). Government funding has been offered conditional on a LBHF contribution of £64M, 50% of the cost, as reported in last weekend’s Observer. This is evidently way beyond the LBHF resources; whilst there has been media reference to the potential of council reserves, the 2019 external auditors report states “…Council do have ongoing financial pressures, which need to be addressed in the medium term… As a result, the Council is now maintaining a reserves position that is below the average when compared to other London Boroughs”. Government funding for local authorities has been considerably reduced in recent years, and an uplift in council tax, aside from social and political issues, would only generate additional income of around £650K per 1% rise.
Foster & Partners bridge proposal
Hammersmith Bridge would seem to be a unique and most deserving case for special funding, and it is so frustrating that the critical issue of project financing is not addressed in the government Task Force meetings, despite its obvious importance. However we understand that, separate to the Task Force meetings, LBHF have been exploring initiatives which draw on the private sector, not only in the Foster/Ritblat temporary bridge proposal, but also investigating the viability of private funding, secured on an income stream provided by a toll: this financing method which has been used for a number of other UK bridges, including in London, the Dartford Crossing. LBHF residents would be likely to cross toll-free. We understand LBHF have now submitted a comprehensive financial plan to Grant Shapps based on this funding approach. Consideration might be given to 1% of the toll to be set aside for social funding in Hammersmith, similar to the arrangement on the London Eye ticket price.
Some valuable comparative information has emerged regarding the financing of other London bridges. For the recent £9.6M repairs to Albert Bridge, RBKC paid £2.6M in line with many other bridge repairs as recent research indicates, while TfL paid £7M. The £9M refurbishment of Chiswick Bridge was paid for by TfL. Since TfL are out of funds, the recent upgrade of Wandsworth Bridge was paid for by Wandsworth Council – but since the bridge is a simple cantilever structure, fabricated in steel in 1940, the overall cost was only around £6M, less than 6% of the bill for the 1887 Hammersmith Bridge.
These comparative repair costs highlight the unique problems with the bridge, an ornate, Grade II* listed structure constructed from cast iron and wood in 1887, two years after the first internal combustion engine came off the Benz production line. Before the traffic closure in April 2019, over 20,000 vehicles and 2,000 single-decker buses were crossing the Bridge daily; until total closure in August 2020 16,000 pedestrians and cyclists were crossing daily. Until 1998 heavy goods vehicles and double-decker buses were using the Bridge.
The Bridge is clearly not fit for this purpose. If the outward appearance of the Bridge is to be retained, then within the decorative outer claddings the structure has to be not repaired, but replaced, to create a Bridge which is able to sustain the demands of 21st century traffic. We discuss this in more detail in the accompanying article.
Site work: Current activity on site is limited to the stripping back and investigation of the two up-river pedestals, which secure the ends of the suspension cables on the west side. This work is being undertaken by Kier contractors and funded from the £1.8 billion second TfL bail-out received from the government in November.
Continued →
We’ve made several meaningful and thought-through suggestions in the half-dozen articles, and as many letters to the main bridge protagonists in the last year, from simple widening the pathways to make the bridge more accessible, and to improve public safety, to ways to invisibly fix the 19th century structure for the longer term, in a maintainable 21st century way. Put simply, we believe the current premise for repairs has set the engineers off on a bit of a wild goose chase. While much good work has been done, how much is useful under an alternate premise, and at what opportunity cost ?
As we pass six months since complete closure, we’ve made it crystal clear that there appears very little, if any, value in repairing the much-debated, though normally invisible, cast iron pedestals shown. We continue to be dismayed that so much attention is paid to evaluating and repairing these simple yet demonstrably unsuitable bolted-in components (c.f. Mott MacDonald summary and more detailed
Aecom report) when replacement with modern equivalents is an obvious solution. Not only that, but by including, as we’ve suggested, a built-in lifting or jacking mechanism for the chains in a new design pedestal, future maintenance inspections and bearing replacements (the cause of many of the current problems, and certainly the precipitous closure), would be reduced to perhaps scheduled weekend roadway closures every 5 years or so, at low cost and public impact. This, without even considering the environmental and financial running costs of the proposed chain heating and monitoring systems that would no longer be needed.
Surely we can’t be the first to spot such an opportunity for a better and long-lasting engineered solution at lower overall cost – plus the opportunity to cut a whole phase of repair work ? The question is why can we only find passing reference to renewal as an option in the copious Aecom report? Which is where we return to the issue of the premise, assumed to include retaining the original components.
The TfL drawings shown at the public meeting in October, to which we responded, show a temporary support frame for “emergency stabilisation” – already designed – that could be better used during pedestal renewal, using offsite built and tested replacements, instead of a long and expensive (£13.9M + percentage – say half – we don’t have a detailed cost breakdown) of the permanent stabilisation costs, totalling c.£30M.
The current proposal for onsite shoring-up would hardly respect the Grade II* listing, Bazalgette’s design, or materials (assuming that’s the rationale), rendering the pedestals unrecognisable as historic components, especially when infilled with [c. 6 tonnes] of steel fibre reinforced concrete as proposed, and would, according to the Aecom report, leave further nascent cast-iron problems, including a possible failure mode where the cast iron collapses onto the unusual prop/concrete/cast iron mix. The cast iron pedestals would instead make fine museum pieces, to accompany Tower Bridge’s stream engine, removed from service when proven equally obsolete over 40 years ago.
Continued →
As membership secretary, I regularly hear the clarion call “I’m not on Social Media so I can’t see your posts…” It’s a popular myth that you must sign up, notwithstanding the fact that our latest Twitter and Facebook postings automatically appear on our home page (have you checked recently..?), all three “platforms” that we use are publicly accessible to anyone, as are most social media sites. They will encourage you to sign up, perhaps even boost the myth that you must for obvious reasons, but you can ignore that without missing that much. However paradoxically it will help our cause if you do sign up and follow us – read on…
I’ve read concerns about tracking, cookies, and a good range of urban myths too, but many are outdated. A number of issues are addressed in our website and accessibility guide and related privacy policy, but in short if you don’t have an account with the platform in question, there’s limited tracking they can do, while at the same time still giving you access to useful local material. Increasingly newer browser versions are closing these avenues of tracking joy, and the effects are often rather more prosaic than perhaps popular hyperbolae might suggest. You can, of course, always delete browsing data, including cookies, or use the Incognito/inPrivate modes available on all modern browsers to properly eliminate tracking if it still concerns you.
#BernieSanders patiently waits to cross the Bridge
It’s a lot simpler and quicker for us to post short updates, reactions to news, and links to events of interest on these platforms – particularly Twitter – than it is to create longform articles such as this, or physical/pdf newsletters. One or two of our survey responses have suggested more regular updates, and this is one way to respond. These postings form a useful complement to our other publishing, as text messages complement email and letters. We post something almost daily on one platform or another, so there’s always something new on the website as a result too.
Continued →
We were surprised and excited in equal measure to see a radical new proposal published by the council, in partnership with Foster and Partners and Sir John Ritblat of Delancey, the company now owning the Earls Court development site. This is designed to temporarily solve the conundrum of getting across the river while the original bridge is repaired. Details can be read on the council’s website, there’s obviously more detailed work needed to bring it to fruition.
Key points are:
There’s been generally positive comment in the press and social media, and we were particularly pleased to see our favoured approach of offsite construction/restoration being embraced, which should improve the quality of the end result.
Since the public Task Force meeting in October, there have been snippets of gossip from behind the scenes, but little significant progress to report. TfL have been instructed to pay for a temporary ferry river crossing, and to contribute £4M towards the bridge stabilising work, drawing from their recent £1.8B government emergency funding.
Central government has now promised to fund the project, conditional on a substantial contribution from the local authority. LBHF report that funds are not available to meet this demand. The Hammersmith Society and others are pressing the government to take the long view, and release the Bridge funds now, and negotiate separately with the local authority, and this is set out in our letters to the Task Force chairman and the Secretary of State for Transport, as previously published.
Enquiries to LBHF and other parties have revealed some further context to the funding problem. We understand that Hammersmith became involuntary owners of the Bridge in 1985, when the government abolished the GLC (Greater London Council); there is no record of a condition audit taking place at the time, and no maintenance arrangement accompanying the gift, which was perhaps a mistake.
In normal circumstances structural repairs to the bridges over the Thames have been paid for by TfL, with costs of a fraction of the c. £150M budget for Hammersmith Bridge; this very substantial cost arises largely from the design of the structure with cast iron, and design restrictions on the repair methods imposed by Historic England Grade ll* listing status.
Continued →
Following the Zoom public meeting three weeks ago, we considered our recent articles on the bridge, and, as promised, wrote to Grant Shapps MP, Secretary of State for Transport, Baroness Vere, Chair, and Dana Skelley, Director of the Bridge Task Force, as shown below (click to open).
We’ve made suggestions borne of our various architectural & engineering experiences, and feedback from members who contributed, balancing aesthetics, cost-effectiveness, speed of the works vs. longevity & value to the public.
We think the repairs might be done more quickly and cheaply, and the result might last longer and be more useful as a bridge, if the slightly modified approach were taken, as outlined. As an alternative, we’ve also dared to think the unthinkable given the proposed closure duration and costs, and suggested bridge replacement. An architectural competition could be held to decide how to best reuse what is there, but make it fit for the next century as Bazalegette did to the 1827 original, back in the 1880’s. As we’ve said, this need not involve a total loss of the iconic appearance; it would be up to innovative designers to come up with the solution – we’ve already seen ideas coming from local architects and engineers.
With huge sums of central Government capital and revenue expenditure being regularly announced, the cost of solving the Hammersmith Bridge problem seems small by comparison, and given the considerable inconvenience already endured both sides of the river by some of the most vulnerable members of society, the project deserves immediate and full financial support.
The website continues to be updated with improvements to layout (such as use of tabs on some new pages), usability, and of course, plenty of new material. We mentioned the new guide recently, it’s been renamed more accurately the Website & Accessibility Guide, and updated. Accessibility improvements include the elimination of the last few recalcitrant contrast errors and one or two missing screen-reader tags.
There have been a couple of significant content additions recently, plus this year’s unfortunate necessity, the previously announced daily-updating H&F Covid-19 graph at the top of the Home Page.
Firstly, we’ve subsumed the content of the original Capability Brown Statue website, created as part of the project led by former committee member Richard Jackson. It now has a permanent home in the history section. There are photos of some of his landscapes, a section describing the project, the history and development of the statue itself, with a video of the unveiling, links to our news stories during the project, and for the record, a list of benefactors, of which this Society was one.
Also noteworthy is the news that there’s a fundraising effort for a riverside sculpture of Virginia Woolf in Richmond, by the same sculptor, Laury Dizengremel.
Each history page now has a set of pictorial/excerpt links to the other history pages at its foot, or in the sidebar, and each page has seen a little TLC too. The history sidebar also now appears on our home page.
Secondly, ‘Lockdown 2’ has provided the time to complete of a longstanding project to map all Awards and Nominations since the start of the scheme in 1990. In reconfirming the postcodes and/or exact locations of all 133 records, some information was updated, and a photo or two refreshed. Click on the map image to explore the area interactively – each colour-coded map pin identifies the type of award and what we know about it, provides a link to a picture if available, and to the relevant year’s Awards page. Perhaps we’ll create some local walks based on it – watch this space!
In Lockdown 2, we continue to post updates on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram, and add diary entries of interest to members. Please follow us on these platforms if you have an account, and keep an eye on the diary which is updated with new events at least weekly.
Small Sites policy in the new London Plan
📣 Our latest edition of Bitesize is available to read: mailchi.mp/018ac4ef729c/f… Subscribe for your monthly hit of village news straight to your inbox. 📬 #hammersmith #brackenburyvillage #w6
— Hammersmith Society @(HammersmithSoc) 2 hours ago
Living for pictures of the Hammersmith seal metro.co.uk/2021/03/06/sea… pictures by @bronile via @MetroUK
— Hammersmith Society @(HammersmithSoc) 1 day ago
Today’s #archivejigsaw is a London Underground poster for the 1910 Japan-British exhibition held in London. The exhibition was an attempt by Japan to introduce its culture to the West, and included Japanese gardens with imported trees, bridges and stones: orlo.uk/ACsMS
— Hammersmith Society @(HammersmithSoc) 2 days ago
©2021, The Hammersmith Society | Privacy | Contact | Join | @ Subscribe | ⓘ
Campaigning for over 50 years